Exclusive: Sri Lanka president weighs backing down in crisis over parliament – sources
Sri Lankan President Maithripala Sirisena is considering dropping an attempt to dissolve parliament, sources close to the president said, possibly easing weeks of political deadlock.
The country has been in a crisis since Sirisena replaced Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe with Mahinda Rajapaksa last month, and then issued an order dissolving parliament and called for a general election.
The sources said the president may now rescind the order, effectively pre-empting a court ruling that they expect to overturn his decision anyway.
Sri Lanka’s top court stayed the dissolution order pending a hearing on its constitutionality that starts on Tuesday, allowing parliament to resume meeting.
Rajapaksa, a former president, has lost two confidence votes in parliament but has refused to resign.
“There is a possibility of withdrawing the gazette,” said a source in regular discussion with Sirisena, referring to the official announcement by which the president dissolved parliament. “I have no doubt that the Supreme Court would say that dissolution was wrong.”
A spokesman for Sirisena, Dharmasri Ekanayake, said he was unaware of any such plans.
“DIGNIFIED EXIT”
A second source in Sirisena’s party said the president was looking for a “dignified exit” by withdrawing the dissolution order as the court was unlikely to rule in his favor.
The Supreme Court is expected to announce its decision as early as Dec 7.
Foreign countries have yet to recognize the new government. The impasse has also pushed the island’s currency to record lows, caused turmoil on its stock and bond markets, and raised fears it may not be able to service debts to finance reconstruction following a 26-year civil war that ended in 2009.
Rajapaksa is seen as a hero by many among Sri Lanka’s Buddhist majority for ending a bloody war with Tamil rebels in 2009, but has been accused by diplomats and international rights groups of human rights abuses, which he denies.
Sirisena came to power in 2015 on a pledge to uphold democracy and stamp out corruption, but his popularity has been hit by a crisis many say he triggered because of personal differences with former Prime Minister Wickremesinghe.
The crisis deepened on Friday when parliament voted to halt payment of ministers’ salaries – a move to pressure the disputed government of Rajapaksa. Rajapaksa loyalists boycotted the vote saying it was illegal.
Separately on Friday, the country’s Appeal Court began a hearing on a petition signed by 122 legislators that challenged Rajapaksa’s authority to hold office after he lost the no confidence votes earlier this month.
(Reuters)
Latest Headlines in Sri Lanka
- IMF backs Sri Lanka’s plan to boost revenue with vehicle imports November 25, 2024
- Bus collision in Watawala injures four amid adverse weather November 25, 2024
- Senior Professor Rathnayake appointed to restore order at University of Ruhuna November 24, 2024
- Sri Lankan fishing vessel seized with massive drug haul in Maldives November 24, 2024
- Audit reveals misuse of electric vehicle permits for migrant workers in Sri Lanka November 23, 2024
It is time to stop further No Confidence Motions against the u-constitutional SLPP Government set up by HE Pallewatte Gamralage Yapa Sirisena.
There are more than 5 parliamentary Motions and the Dictatorial President is not responding.
It is time for an IMPEACHMENT Motion against the Dictatorial HE Pallewatte Gamralage Yapa Sirisena.
An adverse ruling from the highest court could be the basis to institute criminal proceedings against both Sirisena and the entire bureaucracy.
The immunity of the president from prosecution applies only while he is in office and as set out by a Supreme Court ruling in 1999, anyone carrying out his illegal orders can be criminally prosecuted along with him.
Should the Supreme Court hold against the November 9 shock sacking of the parliament, exactly two weeks after Mahinda Rajapaksa was named to replace deposed prime minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, Sirisena and his officials could become liable for a criminal prosecution.
Paragraph 115 of the Penal Code deals with conspiracy against the sovereignty of the people and is punishable with a 20 year jail term.