Petitions against reactivating death penalty: SC issues notice to former President Sirisena
The Supreme Court yesterday (10), noticed former President Maithripala Sirisena to appear before it on 26 May next year and make submissions as to on what conditions he had decided to reactivate the death penalty.
The notice on the former President was issued by a three-Judge Bench comprising Justices Priyantha Jayawardena, Vijith K. Malalgoda and Gamini Amarasekara, after having considered 11 petitions that had been filed against the reactivation of capital punishment by Sirisena.
The petitions had been filed by several organisations, including the Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL), while President’s Counsel Sanjeewa Jayawardena made submissions on behalf of the petitioners.
Jayawardena said, though it is accepted that to any person who has committed any serious offence, punishments should be handed down based on the severity of the offence, such punishments should not take the life out of any person.
He told Court that the reactivation of capital punishment in a civilised society like Sri Lanka will never be accepted and hence it should not be allowed to be reactivated under any circumstance.
He further said, even the majority of lawyers here were totally against the reactivation of the death penalty and that it was due to this reason that the BASL had deemed it one of its duties to file a petition opposing its re-enactment.
Deputy Solicitor General Nerin Pulle appeared for the former President.
(Source: Ceylon Today – By Kamal Mahendra Weeraratna)
Latest Headlines in Sri Lanka
- Sri Lanka President leads discussion on strengthening airport security and combating corruption December 28, 2024
- CAA imposes new maximum retail prices for canned fish effective today December 28, 2024
- Ex-Minister Manusha’s brother arrested in Rs. 3 million job scam December 28, 2024
- Mahinda Rajapaksa’s security chief Neville and son Yoshitha summoned to CID December 28, 2024
- Salochana Gamage arrested by CIABOC in Rs. 9 million bribery case December 28, 2024
Excellent, decision demonstrates independence of judiciary.
BTW, why is he not being summoned for un-constitutionally dismissing his own Govt in Oct 2018?
he did that because of his own inferiority complex. Hope the Courts refer him to a Psychiatrist and confined treatment of his issues in an institution away from the population.
That illegal act wrecked our beloved nation.
Hang this guy.