President Sirisena’s retirement residence: TISL expresses concern
(Photo Source: Maithripala Sirisena’s Official Facebook Page)
Transparency International Sri Lanka (TISL), issuing a statement yesterday (21), expressed its concern over the decision taken by the Cabinet of Ministers to allow President Maithripala Sirisena to continue to reside in his official residence located in Colombo.
The TISL believes that the timing of the decision, when the President is still in office and is the Head of the Cabinet, raises serious questions regarding conflicts of interest. The TISL added that it is underscored by the 2007 decision of the Supreme Court regarding the premature exercise of Executive powers under the Presidents Entitlements Act of 1986.
The TISL went on to mention that the Supreme Court, in 2007, had delivered the verdict in a fundamental rights petition against former President Chandrika Bandaranaike Kumaratunga, in favour of the petitioners, quashing the Cabinet decisions on grants and entitlements to the President, while the President was still in office.
“The TISL is firmly of the stance that decisions pertaining to such entitlements should only be taken at such a time when the sitting President ceases to hold office,” the TISL noted, further questioning the current political context in which the said decision was made, which, according to the TISL, raises red flags on electoral integrity and potential corruption under the Bribery Act.
TISL Executive Director, Asoka Obeysekara said, “A conservative estimate could place the benefit afforded to President Sirisena, as a result of retaining the official residence, at over Rs 360 million over a 20-year period.”
Moreover, the TISL urged the Cabinet to immediately revoke any Cabinet decisions on the entitlements of President Sirisena.
(Source: Ceylon Today)
Latest Headlines in Sri Lanka
- Court dismisses IGP Deshabandu Tennakoon’s petition, orders immediate arrest March 17, 2025
- Nomination process for Sri Lanka’s LG elections starts today March 17, 2025
- Shots fired at house in Midigama March 17, 2025
- Ranil Wickremesinghe rejects Batalanda Commission report March 16, 2025
- CID questions IGP Tennakoon’s family as manhunt continues March 16, 2025
Of course, why does an ex-President who becomes a private citizen require a residence that was progressively developed by the taxpayer as a President’s House?
The President should reside in Janadhipathi Mandiraya in Fort.
Did the past Presidents and the current President choose other residencies because Janadhipathi Mandiraya is haunted?